Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement of GSC Advanced Research and Reviews (GSCARR)
The GSC Advanced Research and Reviews (GSCARR) is committed to maintaining the highest standards of publication ethics. The journal adheres to the COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors and expects ethical conduct from all parties involved in the publishing process, including authors, editors, reviewers, and the publisher.
Duties of the Editor
Publication Decisions
The Editor-in-Chief is responsible for deciding which submitted manuscripts should be published, based on scholarly merit, originality, and relevance. Decisions are guided by journal policies and legal requirements concerning libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism.
Fair Evaluation
Manuscripts are evaluated solely on intellectual content without discrimination based on race, gender, religion, nationality, ethnicity, citizenship, or political beliefs.
Confidentiality
Editors and editorial staff must maintain strict confidentiality regarding submitted manuscripts and must not disclose information except to corresponding authors, reviewers, editorial advisers, or the publisher as appropriate.
Conflicts of Interest
Editors must not use unpublished material disclosed in a submission for personal research without written consent from the author.
Duties of Reviewers
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists editors in decision-making and helps authors improve their manuscripts.
Promptness
Reviewers who feel unqualified or unable to complete a timely review must inform the editor and withdraw from the review process.
Confidentiality
Manuscripts under review must be treated as confidential documents and must not be shared or discussed with others without authorization.
Objectivity
Reviews must be conducted objectively and supported by clear arguments. Personal criticism of authors is inappropriate.
Acknowledgment of Sources
Reviewers should identify uncited relevant work and notify the editor of any substantial similarity between the manuscript and other published works.
Conflicts of Interest
Reviewers must not evaluate manuscripts where conflicts of interest exist and must not use privileged information obtained during the review process for personal advantage.
Duties of Authors
Reporting Standards
Authors must present accurate and original research with sufficient detail and references to allow others to replicate the work. Fabrication, falsification, or misleading statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
Data Access and Retention
Authors may be requested to provide raw data related to their manuscript for editorial review and should retain such data for a reasonable period after publication.
Originality and Plagiarism
Authors must ensure that their work is entirely original and that appropriate acknowledgment is given to the work of others.
Multiple or Redundant Publication
Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal simultaneously constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.
Authorship
Authorship should reflect individuals who have made significant contributions to the research. All co-authors must approve the final version of the manuscript and agree to its submission for publication.
Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest
Authors must disclose any financial or substantive conflicts of interest that might influence the results or interpretation of their work. All sources of financial support should be clearly stated.
Fundamental Errors
If authors discover a significant error or inaccuracy in their published work, they must promptly notify the editor and cooperate in correcting or retracting the article.
GSC Advanced Research and Reviews (GSCARR) advocates the highest ethical standards in scholarly publishing and takes appropriate action against misconduct in order to preserve the integrity and credibility of the scientific record.